The Select Board has announced that a new plan for Hanlon Field track and football field will be on the May Town meeting warrant. We have not yet seen it.
Medway Democratic Town Committee feels strongly that natural grass is the only way to keep our children and drinking water safe from the toxic chemicals found in artificial turf. The Select Board and Parks Dept has focused on artificial turf in the past as the only working option for Medway.
A Public Forum on the Hanlon Project was held Monday, April 14. It was recorded at Medway Cable (WITHOUT CAPTIONS).
ARTWORK COURTESY of Kari Percival
Charles River Watershed regarding artificial turf
Here are excerpts, but please, read the entire page.
CRWA opposes the installation of artificial turf as contrary to our core mission of promoting the health of the Charles River and its watershed. Given the increasing prevalence of synthetic turf usage in watershed communities, CRWA wishes to articulate its position on artificial turf and provide resources for those interested in learning more.
Artificial turf is known to contain potentially harmful compounds.³ Existing studies demonstrate that the use of artificial turf substantially contributes to the release of microplastics, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”), and organic contaminants into nearby waterbodies.⁴ These pollutants are perilous to the natural aquatic environment, can bioaccumulate, and severely threaten the health of fish.
Given the impacts of artificial turf installation, CRWA recommends that it not be used as part of municipal or private projects. Federal and state law has yet to fully regulate the use of artificial turf, and litigation over its ill effects has been inconclusive and sparse, though there are municipal and state efforts to limit its use in Massachusetts. As of March 2024, three bills before the Massachusetts state legislature relate to artificial turf (S.2057, H.3948, S.524). Boston has pledged not to use artificial turf on municipal properties, and state Community Preservation Act program funds may not be used for artificial turf. As the conversation around artificial turf usage advances, CRWA strongly advocates for legislation and policy that reduces artificial turf’s ability to negatively impact the Commonwealth and its waters.
PROTECT OUR WATERSHEDS, ACT TODAY
TOGETHER,WE CAN CREATE A RESILIENT FUTURE
We need your support for the prohibition of state and municipal contracts for artificial turf and the ban of tire-derived materials in playing fields and playgrounds. These materials contribute to microplastic pollution and release harmful chemicals, including PFAS and 6PPD-quinone, which contaminate our waterways and pose substantial risks to our watersheds—the very lifeblood of our ecosystems, drinking water sources—and aquatic ecosystems. The potential for widespread exposure to these toxic chemicals necessitates immediate legislative action to safeguard public health and the environment. By implementing these bans, we prioritize the well-being of our communities and the preservation of our natural resources, thereby mitigating future costly remediation efforts. We urge you
to consider the long-term consequences and support this critical legislation.
WATERSHEDS ACROSS THE COMMONWEALTH OPPOSE PLASTIC GRASS
- Mystic River Watershed
- Charles River Watershed
Areas of Concern:
- Water contamination The leaching of PFAS, 6PPD-Q and other harmful chemicals from artificial turf into waterways is a major concern for all watersheds.
- Microplastic pollution also poses a significant threat to aquatic ecosystems and our drinking water supply.
- Stormwater runoff Artificial turf & pour-in-place playgrounds create an impervious surface, increasing stormwater runoff and contributing to flooding and pollution.
- Heat Island effect Artificial turf & playground surfaces significantly increase surface temperatures, exacerbating heat islands, adversely impacting public health, especially in Environmental Justice communities and heated water run-off impacting aquatic life.
*In the 193rd session, Residents from more than 35 Massachusetts communities demonstrated strong support for the Legislation to ban artificial turf, including Agawam, Amherst, Andover, Arlington, Belmont, Boston, Boxford, Brighton, Concord, Florence, Foxborough, Groveland, Hopkinton, Ipswich, Malden, Medford, Medway, Milton, Montague, Nantucket, Newton, North Andover, Oak Bluffs (Martha’s Vineyard), Pelham, Sharon, Shutesbury, Somerville, Stoneham, Topsfield, Watertown, Wayland, West Boxford, and West Newton. This widespread backing underscores the critical need to pass this Legislation in the 194 session.
2024 Town Meeting Vote
In 2024, the community voted against the replacing of Hanlon Field with artificial turf. Here are some facts about artificial turf: